The correct statement is that Nuremberg Trials established the principle that individuals are accountable for their actions even during time of war. So, the correct option is B.
Nuremberg trials did a research analysis which was concluded by saying that the individual will be responsible for the consequences of his/her actions during war situations.
<h3>Nuremberg Trials </h3>
The Nuremberg Trials were held as a series of 13 studies that were conducted in the Nuremberg city upon the orders of Adolf Hitler in the years 1945.
This conclusive result of these trials was that a nation is not capable of giving attention to individuals as an emergency situation has struck the nation.
As a result, neither the national government nor any leader will be responsible for the actions of an individual during a war crisis.
Hence, the correct option is B that Nuremberg Trials established the principle that individuals are accountable for their actions even during time of war.
Learn more about Nuremberg Trials here:
brainly.com/question/1184542
B
"The argument also assumes that social prejudice can also be overcome by legislation"
the laws assume that you are able to overcome social prejudice without the constitution determining it; you do it by legislation.
i hope this helped you a bit!
<span>Roe v. Wade would be your answer.
</span>
Answer: A lower price for a substitute decreases demand for the other product. A higher price for a substitute good has the reverse effect. Other goods are complements for each other, meaning that the goods are often used together, because consumption of one good tends to enhance consumption of the other.
~Bella M
