<h2>
Answer:</h2>
A. a nonfiction book about natural resources
D. an article about water access in an academic journal
E. an article in a major newspaper making predictions about water access
(Photo for proof at the bottom.)
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
A secondary source provides an outside perspective that interprets or analyzes an event or topic, and are created by people who did not have a first-hand experience on the topic.
A notebook and a speech are not secondary sources because they are created by someone who has a first-hand experience on the topic. Non-fiction books and articles are secondary sources since they are written by someone who only has knowledge on the topic, and hasn't actually experienced the topic.
Here's a photo of Edge, good luck.
<span>But one day Tanovo’s rival, chief of the volcano Nabukelevu, pushed his mountain up and blocked Tanovo’s view of the sunset. Enraged at this, and robbed of the pacifying effects of his daily meditation, Tanovo wove giant coconut-fibre baskets and began to remove earth from the mountain. His rival, however, caught Tanovo and chased him away. Tanovo, in his flight, dropped earth at the islands of Dravuni and Galoa.</span>
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Which of the following statements is the inverse of "If you do not understand geometry, then you do not know how to reason deductively."?
A. If you reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
B. If you do not reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Answer:
The inverse of that statement is:
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Explanation:
To determine the inverse of a statement, we must negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, the hypothesis is "if you do not understand geometry." It is already a negative sentence, which means its negation is "if you understand geometry." The same goes for the conclusion "then you do not know how to reason deductively." Its negation is "then you [know how to ] reason deductively." Putting them together, we have "If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively." - letter C
<span>There is some truth to
this myth backed up by science explanation. A snake’s nervous system will still
be functional for approximately 10 to 12 hours after they are pronounced dead.
So probably that is where the myth or saying “a snake wont die til the sun goes
down” came from. Because 10 to 12 hours is enough time from the morning for the
sun to set down, and the nervous system will be completely dysfunctional and
only will be then that the snake is truly dead. So the best way to ensure the
snake does not bite you or attack you is to kill it, cut off its head and bury
it so that its nervous system will be readily dysfunctional.</span>
Answer:
C. It is about action and contributing to the common good.
Explanation:
A. would not be it bc who is they?
B. would not be it bc nobody asks what service was about.
D. would not be it bc there is more to it than just teens giving produce to a soup kitchen.
