These laws are bad. Creating legal repercussions for someone who simply has a viewpoint that differs from the mainstream (albeit a very odd viewpoint) is similar to the thought police in the book "1984". People should not be prosecuted for ideas, no matter how wrong those ideas or feelings are.
Answer:
- British and Irish dominions
- between supporters of the monarchy of Charles I (and his son and successor, Charles II) and opposing groups in each of Charles’s kingdoms, including Parliamentarians in England, Covenanters in Scotland, and Confederates in Ireland.
The outcome was threefold: the trial and the execution of Charles I (1649); the exile of his son, Charles II (1651); and the replacement of English monarchy with the Commonwealth of England, which from 1653 (as the Commonwealth of England, Scotland, and Ireland)
Answer:
<em>Reign in the war-making ability of the president</em>
Explanation:
- The war power act is also called the War Powers Resolution. It was enacted in November 1973.
- It was a congressional resolution, its main aim was to limit the president's power to escalate or initiate military actions in other parts of the world. It restricted the powers of the US president.
- According to the law president had to notify Congress if he deploys the army. IT also limit the duration for which army can remain engaged without approval of the congress. It was enacted to avoid conflicts like Vietnam war. Many presidents have failed to comply with the regulations of the act and it effectiveness has also been questioned.
C kingdoms are ruled by one person but a state has many governments like California
