Answer: "C"
Explanation:
George Washington's language is ambiguous in this text. At least to me. I have a degree in Economics. A wild guess is "C".
Because my recollection and understanding were Washington believed that the Constitution could be amended. Furthermore, using a process of elimination; A. is wrong because he never makes the claim that alliances are substitutes for the government. B. Can't be either. I am leaning toward "C" and possibly D. In terms of probability, however, I lean toward C.
Answer:
Upon impact,
A lot of people only know that the ship came to a halt. Most people were indifferent.
The wife of Astor went back to bed, Lieutenant Steffanson who had been drinking a Lemonade resumed his pre-occupation.
Some of the card players were too concerned about their game to be concerned. For the most part of the chapter, many people were unaware, others who noticed didn't realise the gravity of the damage and how it would define their lives.
Walter Lord showed the reaction of people to the experience of the impact partly to show that they had the utmost confidence in the vessel and partly because it presents a great contrast to their reaction afterwards when the ship starts to sink.
Cheers
Many people think that athletes don't care about school because of the common stereotype about dumb jocks.
The option that best explains the narrator's decision is:
"Mr. Mathews’ interest in science and in the narrator" (Option A)
<h3>Who is the narrator?</h3>
A narrator is a person through whose perspective a story is told. In literature, there are several types of narrators. They are:
- First-person narrator
- Second-person narrator
- Third-person narrator
- Objective narrator
See the attached for the full question.
Learn more about Narrators at:
brainly.com/question/860877
#SPJ2
