Answer:
I <u><em>THINK</em></u> the answer is B the Soviet boycott of the UN Security Council
Explanation:
American aid would end poverty and halt its spread. In Asia, containment policy followed similar lines to those adopted in Europe. Poor countries devastated by warfare and Japanese domination were given economic aid and a US military presence to help them stem the spread of Soviet-inspired communism.
Yes I would of done it because with out the bombs Japan would of never surrendered and the war would of probably lasted months longer with many more casualties on both sides.
I would of also done it as a show of force to the ussr I see it as a way to show them the destructive power of the us and her allies a way of saying don’t mess with the bull or you get the horns
The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution because Anti-Federalists believed that they were needed in order to protect the citizens.
The Federalists were in favor of the Constitution, they felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and was ultimately harming the country. They wanted to ratify the Constitution, which gave power to the national government, as under the Articles the government was very weak.
The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution, they felt that the Articles of Confederation was fine for the country. They preferred a weak national government, as they had just broken free of British rule and were afraid of tyranny. They argued that if the Constitution was going to be ratified, there needed to be a Bill of Rights added.
While the Federalists didn't necessarily think a Bill of Rights was needed, they wanted the Anti-Federalists to agree with them, so the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution.
I feel like everyone can agree with the decision to add a Bill of Rights. They are very important in protecting our rights and preventing the government from abusing its power on the people. They are our natural rights and it is important that they are secured.
Yes, it is true that President Jackson opposed the national bank because he felt that it enabled eastern businesspeople to make money at the expense of southern planters and western f<span>armers, since he valued himself as a champion of "common" people. </span>
