Answer:
A. Congress impeaches the president for corruption.
Explanation:
The rule of the law is deemed a fundamental principle of a free and just government in which all people, institutions and the government, are equally accountable under the law, meaning that the law is equally applied to all, regardless of economic status, race, genre, age, beliefs, or position in the government.
Option A illustrates this principle because it demonstrates that even heads of authority like the President is accountable under the law and they are not exempt from penalties (such as impeachment) if they do something illegal, implying that the law is equally applied to all.
Woodrow Wilson differed from Teddy Roosevelt and William Howard Taft in a couple different ways. For example, Wilson was in favor of lowering tariffs (aka taxes on imported goods) while Taft was in favor of higher tariffs. Wilson was different than Teddy in the sense that Wilson wanted to break up all trusts. Roosevelt, on the other hand, wanted to break up only the trusts he deemed bad. This shows that even though they were all Progressives, Wilson had a little different idea of how America should be run compared to Taft and Roosevelt.
That mostly depends on the country that held them, however, the common forms of protest were either calm protests that weren't violent, or they were full blown civil wars of independence with numerous battles, or they were based on guerilla warfare where they would lead a war of attrition with the western powers until they decided to just leave.
Answer:
the colony had the best chance
Explanation: the colony knew the land more than the troops from britian and they had help from the frech.
