Answer:
purpose is the point the author is trying to get across, a social thing. The authors perspective is his thoughts, a personal thing.
Answer:
pro - get a better look at good jobs just bc of a piece of paper
con - loans and fines for years to pay off unless you get the millitary to pay for your collage
pro- get one of the highest educations you can
con - go to tech school make just as good of money but less loans to pay off
if you come from a poor family like me and want to go to collage go to the navy army or somthing like that they will pay for your collage and you get a check for the rest of your life and hey who knows that might be the carrer you want to pruse once u get in there
Answer:
I plan to prove that college athletes should be paid to play. This matters because many people going into college play sports and they give up much of their time to do so. The athletes at a college are almost always the first students to arrive and the last to leave the campus. They arrive early to begin training and stay late because of big games. They should be paid because they give up a lot of their time to be at the practices. Some teams practice during class times which can mess up an athlete's academic schedule, others practice late at night when an athlete would want to be doing their homework or hanging out with friends. They should be paid because each win they have they give the college popularity and even perhaps money.
Counter claim: Athletes do not need to be paid because they got a scholarship to come which helps pay for their schooling already.
Explanation:
This is the best I got, it should give you some idea of how to get into this
