Historical fiction and biography are two genres that might appear very similar at first, but that are in fact quite different. Historical fiction, as the name describes, is fictional. This means that it does not describe facts or provable events. While it is based on history (hence the term "historical"), it does not claim to recreate history. An example of historical fiction would be <em>Outlander</em>, by Diana Gabaldon. On the other hand, biographies are based on the life of a person who lived in the past. These are mostly factual and are based on research of events that happened and people that did exist. Therefore, these more closely resemble reality.
////////////true//////////////
This is the complete question
O A.
The new definition for planets needs to be considered as settled moving forward.
OB.
The IAU used poor methods when setting a new definition for planets.
OC.
It is uncertain whether the definition of planet will remain the same in the future.
OD
Pluto should not have been the reason why IAU changed the definition of planets.
It is uncertain whether the definition of the planet will remain the same in the future. Thus, option "C" is correct.
<h3>What is the description of planets?</h3>
The description of planets has been updated by the International Astronomical Union. In the current description, the planet is regarded if it satisfies three criteria.
It will be in the sun's direction, it should have enough mass to have stable hydro stability, and the area should be clear. It is unclear if the definition will stay the same in the world because certain planets will convey such distinctive features and the concept may be modified.
Thus, option "C" is correct.
To learn more about planets click here:
brainly.com/question/14581221
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. A i think so its A part and maybe also b part
