No, this is not a run-on sentence
The best comparison of the authors’ purpose in these two essays about genetically modified food is:
- The purpose of both essays is to persuade the reader of a specific point of view.
<h3 /><h3>What is the Purpose of a Text?</h3>
A text can serve different purposes. The aim could be to inform, entertain, or persuade the listener.
So when the author in two different essays described the effects of genetically modified foods, his intent was to convince the readers of his own point of view. His views were backed with facts.
Learn more about the purpose of a text here:
brainly.com/question/1119015
#SPJ1
It killed her and her family, except her father. after being found after about 2 years of hiding, she was dragged away to a concentration camp, where she later died after her sister did.
B. to
emphasize his epiphany
<span>Using Feld’s point of view means that he has become the
readers’ object of sympathy. The readers will comprehend his feelings and
thoughts since they are given the insights about him and how he sees the other
characters. In order to relate better about Feld’s epiphany towards the end,
his limited POV narration was used.</span>
I think the answer is B-Hyperbole
