Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
Answer:
36%
Explanation:
Foremost, 18 of 50 can be written as:
18 / 50
Multiply both the numerator and denominator with 100:
18 / 50 = (18 ⋅ 100) / (50 ⋅ 100)
The above equation can be simplified/rewritten as:
((18 ⋅ 100) / 50) / 100
Solving the expression inside the bracket above produces:
36 / 100
So we have (in percentage notation):
36%
I hope this helps!
When state troopers met the demonstrators at the edge of the city and beat them, it triggered a wave across the nation that led to civil rights movement evolving and the passages of legislation
