1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Margaret [11]
3 years ago
15

Which statement is true about the institution of religion?

History
1 answer:
liubo4ka [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: D

Explanation:

because the rest are false

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer. Which statement describes an outcome of the hundred years war? A. France was left with economic probl
garik1379 [7]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

you gave no other options

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who makes most of the economic decisions in the United States
sineoko [7]
The people of the United States
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following BEST describes the Great Migration? (1 point)
Andrews [41]
<span>African Americans went to Northern cities for better opportunities</span>
3 0
3 years ago
The difference between the "Old Lights" and "New Lights" was:
jekas [21]

Answer:

Answer : The Old lights stressed emotionalism in their preaching ; the New lights did not.

Explanation:

The Old lights  refer to the group of people from a split congregation who still believe in the old doctrine while the New lights are the set of people from the same congregation that splits, who embrace the new things or doctrine that were introduced.

The two groups of people can be differentiated by many things , some of them are.

The OLD light-

1 . They are orthodox clergymen that were deeply skeptical of the emotionalism

2. The clergymen condemned the cryings out, fainting and covulsion in revival meetings.

The NEW light-

1. Allow working miracles or speaking with tongues.

2. Allow woman to speak in public and as a preacher.

3. Refused to be silenced no matter the case may be.

4 0
3 years ago
Why was john dean’s testimony against president nixon so damaging? dean had been a lawyer for two of the watergate burglars. dea
bonufazy [111]

John dean’s testimony against President Nixon was damaging because he have been an important official in the White House.

<h3>What is the testimony about?</h3>

As an official in the White house, he gave a testimony in relation to the Watergate scandal that Nikon was accused for during his election campaign,

Hence, his testimony was damaging because he have been an important official in the White House.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about Watergate scandal

<em>brainly.com/question/1687216</em>

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did colonist say the king was unfit to be
    13·1 answer
  • Earliest written records of drama come from _____.
    6·1 answer
  • The present-day cities of albany and new york were first part of what colony?
    5·2 answers
  • Equitable in a sentence
    8·2 answers
  • 5. How were North Vietnamese troops infiltrating South Vietnam?
    9·1 answer
  • which of the three major industries that experienced grown in texas during the beginning of the 20th century will be the most im
    11·1 answer
  • The Olmec civilization existed from around 1400 BCE to around 400 BCE. They established trade routes
    14·1 answer
  • Which battle is considered the most significant Civil War battle fought in the indian territory? Summarize the battle and its ou
    12·1 answer
  • What happened to President Clinton and his wife, Hillary, in the Whitewater case?
    12·2 answers
  • URGENT HELP NEEDED
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!