When the debates over the 3/5th Compromise was had, in relation to the above options, the answer is none of the above.
<h3>What happened during the debate for the 3/5h compromise?</h3>
The delegates from the Southern part of the states argued that enslaved people should be treated as people if it came to voting and representation.
They did this to ensure that they would have more representation in Congress even though their population was less than the North.
Find out more on the 3/5th Compromise at brainly.com/question/744051.
Mercantilism- beliefs in the benefits of profitable trading
import- bringing food into a country
export- sending goods to another county
enumerated article- goods that the english colonies exported to england
legislature- the legislative body of a country or state
indentured servant- a person who has contracted to work unpaid for a few years in exchange to come to north america
navigation acts- a declaration that only English ships would be allowed to bring goods into England
dominion of new england- a union of English colonies covering New England and the Mid-Atlantic Colonies
english bill of rights- an act signed into law in 1689 by William III and Mary II
hope this helped :)
Above the 1st Cataract of the Nile up to the confluence at Khartoum.
The correct answer is - B. Latin American leaders demanded independence.
Napoleon with his conquests and waging wars managed to weaken lot of countries. One of those countries was Spain. Spain already seemed to have troubles in its colonies, and when Napoleon attacked it, he managed to significantly weaken it, which sparked the independence movements across Latin America.
The Latin American leaders were carefully monitoring the development of the situation, and once they thought that Spain is no longer strong enough to be able to stop the revolutions, they decided to act. The people were already very frustrated by the Spanish leadership, so the leaders of this region used that momentum and started to make revolutions. One by one, the Latin American countries started to gain independence, some sooner than others, and it really turned out that Spain was not able to oppose all of them.
I do. The states have all approved the guarantees and protections listed in the Bill of Rights. There is a proper means for altering the Bill of Rights should a State no longer support one of them. That is the method which should be used when a State wants something changed.
