Answer:
This is hard, but here we go:
Explanation:
The English homework was incredibly difficult to complete last night, and it took countless hours of my time to get everything just right and to fully comprehend the questions.
So what I did was add many phrases to it, and also added more challenging words, like "comprehend" and "incredibly difficult"
Answer:
Such results only tell us how well one is programmed to regurgitate mostly useless information, mostly in regards to one of 7 kinds of intelligence.
This can be a good indicator on whether or not a person will be able to handle even higher amounts of regurgitation of information at the university level. The hope is that students will major in a study that will at least expose them to the tools of critical thinking, which is mostly limited to the hard sciences.
“Learners” who score high can will feel overblown grandiose feelings, and see themselves as superior to those with lower scores, regardless of their future accomplishments (or lack of them). “Learners” who score low will tend to feel humbled and maybe depressed, in that they are typecast as being somehow unable to be much of a future contributor to society.
Fortunately, a significant number of people at ANY point of the spectrum of such scoring to see how well trained a monkey they are, realize the absurdity of such scoring, and go on to find out where they DO excel in one of the other 7 kinds of intelligence. They often end up contributing MORE to society, once they find there “gift” where they “score” much higher
Explanation:
Answer:
man vs man is a type of conflict. It could be seen as irony as what happened
The hatchet itself probably represents survival
Answer:
Explanation:
1: Who was Seretse Khama?
2: In which way were Nelson Mandela and Luther King similar?
