Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
The chief legislator has the power of signing a law or vetoing it. The later case would occur when the Chief Legislator rejects the passing of a bill.
The resolution of the XYZ affair shows the United States wanted to establish diplomatic relationships with other countries and avoid non-ethical negotiations.
The XYZ affair was a diplomatic conflict between the United States and France, this conflict occurred by the end of the 18th century and led to a naval war.
This diplomatic conflict was considered controversial because members of the French government tried to bribe the American diplomats to begin the negotiations. This event was opposed by the American government, and the conflict between both countries increased.
All this situation led the United States to two main actions:
- The creation of the Alien and Sedition act that restricted immigrants, especially those from "hostile nations".
- The creation of protocols for official communications and negotiations between countries.
These two actions show the willingness of the United States to create diplomatic relationships with other countries but avoid a similar situation that involved bribes or non-ethical communication.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/19563529
Answer:
I dont think thats possible
Explanation:
But in my history class they asked the same question and the teacher said maybe around 3-4million dollars
Answer:
The tactic, Germany First was where the allies concentrated on Germany, as they theorized that Germany would be a long-lasting affect compared to Italy or the Japanese Empire. One of their strategies was to outlast Germany, constantly pouring resources into the war effort, while blockading Germany. America's power of mechanical manufacturing was also a major point in the war in Europe. They really just pushed through the German lines with sheer numbers.
Explanation:
Answer:
Following the Cuban Revolution of 1959, bilateral relations deteriorated substantially. In October 1960, the U.S. imposed and subsequently tightened a comprehensive set of restrictions and bans against the Cuban government, ostensibly in retaliation for the nationalization of U.S. corporations' property by Cuba.
