Answer:
The idea of a socialist state stems from the broader notion of state socialism, the political perspective that the working class needs to use state power and government policy to establish a socialised economic system. This may either mean a system where the means of production, distribution and exchange are nationalised or under state ownership, or simply a system in which social values or workers' interests have economic priority. However, the concept of a socialist state is mainly advocated by Marxist–Leninists and most socialist states have been established by political parties adhering to Marxism–Leninism or some national variation thereof such as Maoism, Stalinism or Titoism. A state, whether socialist or not, is opposed the most by anarchists, who reject the idea that the state can be used to establish a socialist society due to its hierarchical and arguably coercive nature, considering a socialist state or state socialism as an oxymoron. The concept of a socialist state is also considered unnecessary or counterproductive and rejected by some classical, libertarian and orthodox Marxists, libertarian socialists and other socialist political thinkers who view the modern state as a byproduct of capitalism which would have no function in a socialist system.
Explanation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_state
Explanation:
Check the picture i sent you i hope it'll help
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. Below are the choices. I belive the answer is A.
A) the city had been barricaded by the Japanese before the attack
B) the Chinese armed forces had been removed from the city
C) the food supply to the city had been cut off leaving the citizens in poor health
D) the citizens were not allowed to keep any weaponry for their defense
Germany crumbled into a number of small territories, each rule by a powerful noble called a duke. The dukes deliberately elected the weakest among themselves to be the “King of Germany”.
Hello. You did not show the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for that question to be answered.
However, taking into account the insanity of melta for the human race, the author may have compared humans and metals, to show how humans were very dependent not only on metal, but also on the manipulation of metal and how it changed history and human evolution, making life without metals totally indispensable.