Answer:
In ancient times, the "land between two rivers" was called Mesopotamia.
Well, the Americans were fighting in common territory. the British were fighting on foreign land. The British had [plenty of food, good uniforms, trained commanders and new rifles and supplies. The American officer had fairly the same training as British officers. In the French& Indian war, such ones as Washington and Israel Putnam had fought extraordinarily in that war. The rebels used guerrilla fighting in the areas where they could easily maneuver and escape. Also, one British army was required to fight over one large area as opposed to numerous groups of Continental forces.
Rebels also had disadvantages such as no government and no real means of funding its forces. But it had motivation. Unlike the British, they were fighting for their families and rights. They had good lines of communication and numerous routes of escape in the case of defeat. Also, Britain was at odds with many European countries, who eagerly lent aid with the great victories won by the Americans
About 1 in 4 American Indians died during the journey.
Explanation:
Chirokee the tribal of America, known as native American forced to leave their native land and move to a new city of North America, Oklahoma. They had not moved willingly that's why these movement is known as trail of tears. About 1 in 4 American Indians died during this journey.
It was a result of Indian removal policy. The then president of America Andrew Jackson did this in the year 1839. Orginally Chirokees are the people who lived in the east of Mississippi river. The distance between Mississippi river to Oklahoma city was 1000 mile.
By the time World War II ended, most American officials agreed that the best defense against the Soviet threat was a strategy called “containment.” In his famous “Long Telegram,” the diplomat George Kennan (1904-2005) explained the policy: The Soviet Union, he wrote, was “a political force committed fanatically to the belief that with the U.S. there can be no permanent modus vivendi [agreement between parties that disagree].” As a result, America’s only choice was the “long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies.” “It must be the policy of the United States,” he declared before Congress in 1947, “to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation…by outside pressures.” This way of thinking would shape American foreign policy for the next four decades.
