B). Both show conflict between the rights of individuals and groups.
Explanation:
The illustration of the public protest, as well as the family dinner, are alike as they both display how common interests of people are above the individual interests. The 'common' interests are given priority as they function to safeguard the rights of the majority without endangering the individuals.
The 'democratic elections' are held to assess the individual opinions of the people in the society but the majority determines that 'who would represent them' and therefore, it seems that 'One person has to give up a right for the good of the group.' But it doesn't imply that individual opinions don't matter but rather that 'they contribute in the majority' as the individuals collectively form a group and thus, every opinion matters. Conclusively, it implies that this conflict resolves with the 'common/majority' good being given the priority over the individual interests. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
