Answer:
(B) The opening question shows the issue to be a choice between common sense and nonsense.
Explanation:
The other options mentioned seem to be evaluating the content of the person’s argument rather than focusing on the argument’s structure. You can see this in (A), where the focus is on the emotional impact of the used words. You can also see it in (C), where the evaluation is instead of the feasibility of the citizen’s argument. It is also apparent in (D), where the evaluation is directed to the ideas proposed inside the argument.
From this breakdown, it is clear that the statement that focuses on the content of the argument is only option (B).
Personally I would not because what if one was allergic to the smell of certain things. This would cause allergic reactions. I think it was unsuccessful because people already had televisions and having a “Smell-O-Vision” was the same thing but being able to smell.
Answer:
A.) The crescent moon was beautiful as its luminous glow lit the sky.
Explanation:
A is the best answer because it makes the most sense and it was written the simplest.
B is incorrect because it would need commas enclosing "as its luminous glow lit the sky" to make sense.
C is incorrect because it would need commas enclosing "as it lit the sky".
D is incorrect because it has too many unnecessary commas.
Answer:
Sharing precise news with the public without taking bribes from the officials for printing wrong reports.
Every news that is crafted by the media would be available for the public.
Explanation: