A dialogue or a copy of an author in their own words is about to happen
It might mean the destruction of a planet or of natural ecosystems.
The central idea of Mike kubick's article 'The salem (and other) witch hunts' was to show how people, mainly women, were chased by the Church and obliged to confess crimes they hadn't committed. All this hunt was made 'in the name of God' and it was very difficult to escape or to think about denouncing the problem to authorities since they were the same people that committed such an abominable act.
We can see here that "Address to the Nation on the Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan” by President Ronald Reagan depict: Discredits an opposing view.
<h3>Who is President Ronald Reagan?</h3>
President Ronald Reagan is actually known to be the 40th president that United States had. He was a member of the Republican Party and also served as the governor of California.
We see that the statement he made here actually depicts that he discredits an opposing view.
Learn more about President Ronald Reagan on brainly.com/question/14130764
#SPJ1
Answer:
The sentence that has an error in subject-verb agreement is:
His discoveries was a combination of luck and hard work.
Explanation:
When we say a subject and a verb have to agree, we mean the verb must be inflected in accordance to the subject. If the subject is singular, the verb must also be singular. If the subject is plural, the verb is also plural. The verb "to be", especially, is quite an irregular verb, and requires due attention.
Having that in mind, we can say the sentence that contains an error is "His discoveries was a combination of luck and hard work." The noun "discoveries" is the main word of the subject, and it is plural. However, the verb "was" (past form of the verb "to be") can only be used for singular subjects. For the sentence to be correct, it should be:
His discoveries were a combination of luck and hard work.