1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artyom0805 [142]
4 years ago
10

What is the importance of the Edict of Milan issued by the Emperor Constantine in 313 A.D.?

History
2 answers:
MatroZZZ [7]4 years ago
8 0
Due to Emperor Constantine's the Edict of Milan issued in 313 A.D., Christianity was finally legalized as a faith of the same importance as other religions that existed at the moment. Prior to that edict, Christians were persecuted as members of sects, because Christianity was not yet an official religion, but rather a cult believing, so after that moment, they were free to practice this religion if they wanted to. 
Sati [7]4 years ago
6 0

The answer is : It granted full toleration to all religions, including Christianity

You might be interested in
Which of the following was not a colonial response to the British acts
Alex_Xolod [135]
C all the others are included in history
5 0
3 years ago
The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom abolished
bogdanovich [222]
Change came in 1786 when Virginia passed the Statute for Religious Freedom. Drafted by Thomas Jefferson, the new law served as a model for the First Amendment. It established a clear separation of church and state. So the answer is B
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pressure for reform in British India came from
pochemuha

The answer is A) educated Indians seeking self-rule. Men like Mohandas K. Gandhi who were educated in the West began campaigning for independence after years of British rule where many Indians were being treated unfairly.  He began to launch a campaign of independence through civil disobedience that led to the emergence of India and Pakistan.

6 0
3 years ago
How does the relationship between government and religion in zanj differ from the same relationship in dar al islam?
GaryK [48]

First of all. A definition of these and other terms is necessary:

- Dar Al Islam: in Arabic it literally means the "House of Islam". It is an Islamic political/legal term referring to the countries where Islam is practiced by the vast majority of the inhabitants and where the government and all rulers are are Islamic.

- Dar Al Harb: literally means the "house of war" and applies to all countries that do not have an armistice or a treaty of peace with Muslims. According to Islamic jurisprudence, it is not only licit and legal to attack and harass such countries by any means possible until they accept to convert to Islam or accept being the vassals of an adjacent Caliphate.

- Zanj: Arabic meaning "black" or "<u>negro</u>" was the region of Southeast Africa on the Swahili coast that was populated by black Africans. Zanj was the name that Medieval Muslim geographers used to refer to that area. Arab and Persian colonists founded settlements on the coastal areas of these regions. They ruled them according to Sharia Law and held all political and economic power. The blacks or Zanj were either conscripted to fight in Muslim armies or were sold as slaves to all the Islamic countries located on the coasts of the Indian Ocean.

Now that those definitions have been provided the answer is much simpler:

In Dar Al Islam, the Muhammadans were the majority and they were above all other social groups. Society was organized around Islam and the government and the religion were one since Islam does not recognize the separation of religion and state. It is the "abode of peace" since it is considered Islamic land and all Muslim subjects enjoy supremacy and several rights and privileges over non-Muslim majorities. Any of the Muslim Caliphates is considered to be Dar Al Islam.

Zanj on the other hand, is located within what Islamic lawmakers considered Dar Al Harb, the "house of war". The inhabitants of this area were animist, black unbelievers that according to Islamic religious and political doctrine were legally under the power of Muslims that could rule them and enslave them and use them as cannon fodder for their armies. Of course, the Islamic settlements where the Arab and Persian rulers lived were small Dar Al Islam enclaves since the rulers and the laws were Islamic but Muslims were not the majority and Islam was officially at war with the local Zanj unbelievers. Furthermore, the Zanj were not Arabs and spoke no Arabic so they were of course barred from any government position and were not even protected as <em>dhimmis </em>since they were not a People of the Book. Therefore in Zanj, the relationship between government and religion was a colonial one, unlike the one in Dar Al Islam.


7 0
3 years ago
How did nazism differ from other political belief systems
boyakko [2]

Answer:

Nazis were outright extremists. What set them apart from the other extremist parties at the time was hitler's language and volume of his speech.

Explanation:

Hitler was known as a hotheaded politician since he was quick to anger and swore a lot during his speeches. The Nazi parties' popularity grew and grew to the point where you could only choose from the communists and the nazis. Since the communists were already feared (because of the red scare) many turned to the nazis

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who came up with the concept of the trinity?
    14·1 answer
  • How does the Etruscan sculpture, Sarcophagus with Reclining Couple, reflect another culture's influence? Be sure to identify the
    5·1 answer
  • What are the three main sources of income for the Dominican Republic?
    12·1 answer
  • Explain why the itialian city states were so prosperous during the renaissance
    7·1 answer
  • How did Benjamin Franklin affect the debate over the Albany Plan of Union?
    7·2 answers
  • Over 50% of the world’s oil reserves are near which body of water?
    9·1 answer
  • How did mountains affect government in the ancient Greek city-states?
    8·1 answer
  • President George Washington took the oath of office on April 30, 1789. Abraham Lincoln was sworn in as president on March 4, 186
    5·1 answer
  • The battle of Saratoga was significant because it was victory and
    9·1 answer
  • What did the progressives try to do and/or why were they needed?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!