All categories

3 years ago

Which event causes Eteocles and Polyneices to engage one another in battle?

English

2 answers:

Bogdan [553]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The answer is: The Theban army counterattacks.

Explanation:

Polynices and Eteocles decided to divide the kingdom agreeing that each would reign alternately for a year. In the year they did not have to reign, they should be absent from Thebes, to try to avoid the curse thrown by their father.

After arriving in Thebes, the siege of the city began. During it, Polinices attacked the door defended by his brother Eteocles and decided to challenge themselves to a unique duel, during which they killed each other.

The answer is: The Theban army counterattacks.

STALIN [3.7K]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

You might be interested in

What is the most important reason for limiting the number of main points in a speech?

Dahasolnce [82]

So that you don't drift off from the topic and to make it nice and simple

6 0

3 years ago

Have you any idea............ ? a. What is his name b. what his name is My friend prefers coffee C. what name tea

vitfil [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Select the correct answer. Read the scenario. Two hundred students rally outside a local school district’s central building to p

katrin2010 [14]

Answer:

because

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu.

Tema [17]

Answer:

The rhetorical appeal found in this excerpt of the speech is pathos, because it appeals to audience's feelings of unity and patriotism.

I just took the test on Plato/Edmentum and got it correct ♡ Hope this helps !

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following arguments uses a non sequitur fallacy?

GuDViN [60]

The argument that uses a non sequitur fallacy is C, "Regulations on motorists should be lifted because factories are a bigger source of pollution"

Explanation: Non sequitur fallacy is when the conclusion doesn't follow the premises. That said in different words, the premises is an irrelevant reason to support the conclusion.

So, as true as it is that factories are a bigger source of pollution, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that regulations on motorists should be lifted, does not necessarily mean that the reason to do that is that factories are a bigger source of pollution.

8 0

3 years ago