The answer is B, at least I think.
The definition of explicit is,“to fully and clearly express something, leaving hing, leaving nothing implied.” Something is explicit when it is cleared stated and spelled out and there is no room for confusion, as in the writing of a contract or statute.
So, explicit evidence is information directly stated in the text. The author comes right out and tells you the information.
When they say "The cello has four strings that lie across the bridge piece; it does not have marked frets," they're directly implying the cello is a hard instrument to play.
Hoped I helped you!
Good luck on whatever you're doing!
Answer:
Present is the right answer.
Explanation:
It is not past or present participle because the verb is not in a form wich ends in <u>'</u><u>ing</u><u>'</u><u>.</u><u> </u> Past is also not correct because the verb is not in past tense, and she is talking about what's currently happening. Therefore Present should the right one.
The answer is:
D) by showing what a typical bicycle looked like at the turn of century.
Hope it helps!
It can best be described as the writer's opinion
<span />
Answer:
As I climbed out of the New York City subway, one man (lets call him <em>Red)</em> in a red jacket, blue denim torn on the knees, and a hair that had been combed upward and jelled together to make it look like a chicken's comb dashed down the stairs. But for the rails, he would have knocked me over. He nearly lost his balance as well.
He was being chased by another man (who I will call <em>The</em> <em>Chaser)</em>. I didn't stay to find out why, but I did see that The Chaser caught up with red and a fight ensued.
Before I finally took the few steps up and away from the subway, two cops who were on patrol had intervened. At this time, however, red's nose was gushing with red blood.
Cheers!
