1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ElenaW [278]
3 years ago
10

Why did we need a new constitution?

History
2 answers:
Alexus [3.1K]3 years ago
5 0
Americans felt uncertain about whether the Constitution would be an improvement over the Articles of Confederation, the nation’s first government. But some, like the mechanics and manufacturers in New York City who wrote this petition to Congress, were thrilled to have a new government that was intended to address the many problems that arose under the Articles. For Constitution Day on September 17, your students can get a sense of the economic problems that existed under the Articles of Confederation by reading this petition from citizens who were directly—and negatively—affected by them. The petitioners explained the economic problems they faced under the Articles, and then expressed their hope and confidence that the new Federal Congress would eighteenth century language to identify the petitioners’ concerns. At the beginning of the petition, the New Yorkers described their elation at the success of the Revolution: “They contemplated this event as the point at which a happy era was to commence, and as the source whence a new system of blessings should spring.” But they quickly realized that the central government under the Articles was too weak to prevent Great Britain from dominating trade. Despite America’s immense resources, attempts at manufacturing new items were hampered by lower British prices. The Articles gave the central government no power to tax the British imports, and the manufacturers in New York and elsewhere discovered that they could not compete: “They soon perceived with the deepest regret, that their prospects of improving wealth were blasted by a system of commercial usurpation, originating in prejudices and fostered by a feeble government.” quickly address them. petitioners believed that they could achieve commercial success if the government could tax imports to make their products comparable in price: “Wearied by their fruitless exertions, your Petitioners have long looked forward with anxiety for the establishment of a government which would have power to check the growing evil, and extend a protecting hand to the interests of commerce and the arts.” The new Constitution allowed them to feel optimistic about their chances for future economic success: “Such a government is now established. On the promulgation of the Constitution, just now commencing its operations, your Petitioners discovered in its principles the remedy which they had so long and so earnestly desired.” The petitioners then stated to Congress their confidence that it would act to resolve the problem they had described: “To your Honorable Body the Mechanics and Manufacturers of New York look up with confidence, convinced, that, as the united voice of America has furnished you with the means, so your knowledge of our common wants has given you the spirit to unbind our fetters and rescue our country from disgrace and ruin.”The petitioners were correct to be confident in the new government—the second act passed by the First Congress was for the taxation of imports (“An Act for laying a duty on goods, wares, and merchandises imported into the United States, as introduced in the Senate,” May 18, 1789, from the Records of the U.S. Senate, seen above). (The first act was for an oath of office.) This act answered the New Yorkers call, and established support for a government strong enough to protect its own business.
Viktor [21]3 years ago
4 0
The Constitution of the United States established America's national government and fundamental laws, and guaranteed certain basic rights for its citizens. ... Under America's first governing document, the Articles of Confederation, the national government was weak and states operated like independent countries. hopes this helps :)
You might be interested in
This person would have most strongly agreed that which of the
babunello [35]

I think that answer is d

5 0
4 years ago
Why did the people stay in the tenements ?
trasher [3.6K]

The answer is A) they didnt make enough money to move

6 0
3 years ago
How did ideas of the enlightenment lead to the independence and founding of the united states of america?
MArishka [77]
The ideas of the enlightenment lead to them foundation of Independence because it gave them hope to do something new
6 0
3 years ago
TIMED! REALLY APPRECIATE SOME HELP! TYSM!!!
Nataly [62]
1. Hamilton's critics claimed that his scheme would provide enormous profits to speculators who had bought bonds from Revolutionary War veterans for as little as 10 or 15 cents on the dollar. For six months, a bitter debate raged in Congress, until James Madison and Thomas Jefferson engineered a compromise.


2. Southerners opposed this plan because many of the Southern states had already paid off their war debts.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Fugitive Slave Act anger Northerners? a) It contradicted the Missouri Compromise. b) It increased federal interventi
Papessa [141]

The answer is <u>b) It increased federal intervention in the affairs of independent states.</u>

By the time these federal Acts were enacted in the U.S., several Northern states had already abolished slavery but it was legal in the Southern states. The Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850 allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States, aiming to prevent that the Northern states would become safe havens for runaway slaves.

The last act was more rigid in their provision and stated more regulation, including the guarantee of harsher punishments for anyone interfering in runaways slave's capture, the right of slave owners and their “agents” to search for escaped slaves within the borders of free states and compelled citizens to assist in their capture as well. It also denied slaves the right to a jury trial, among others.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 implied much government's intervention in the state's affairs, and this angered most northern states. They responded by intentionally neglecting the law or creating acts that nullified or that protected black people, the so-called "personal liberty laws", and by making great efforts to assist runaway slaves, among others.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The abbreviations BC and AD are still commonly used to label different eras of world history. This fact supports which of the fo
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the purpose of the speech "Communists in the State Department"?
    7·1 answer
  • What we’re the major consequences of the civil war
    14·1 answer
  • The biblical word Zion is often used as a synonym for
    6·1 answer
  • How does the Constitution divide the duties and powers of the government? <br><br><br>I NEED HELP
    7·1 answer
  • True or False The Mongol empire under Genghis Khan was larger than the Mongol empire under his grandson Kublai Khan
    7·1 answer
  • The convention of 1818 helped what?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of these is an example of regulatory policy?
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the Battle of Kings Mountain different from other clashes during the war?
    11·1 answer
  • Cars Walt in Long Lines at Gas Pump, 1979
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!