A strong argument that can be made from the Articles of Confederation was that it is a direct reflection of "the rhetoric and ideas associated with the American colonial interpretation of direct representation is woven throughout the Articles."
This is evident in that the Articles of Confederation gave the States more power than the central government.
This is based on the idea that states government comprises people who are more of a direct representation of the people in that state.
It is also believed that since the power should belong to the people, then it is the state government that best serves as the direct representation of the people.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option B. "The rhetoric and ideas associated with the American colonial interpretation of direct representation are woven throughout the Articles."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/6785424
Answer:
Nations and constants laws were being rewritten
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
This is describing a god forming the earth
Mansa Musa I was the ruler of the Mali Empire in West Africa from 1312 to 1337 CE. Controlling territories rich in gold and copper, as well as monopolising trade between the north and interior of the continent, the Mali elite grew extremely wealthy. A Muslim like his royal predecessors, Mansa Musa brought back architects and scholars from his pilgrimage to Mecca who would build mosques and universities that made such cities as Timbuktu internationally famous. Mansa Musa’s 1324 CE stopover in Cairo, though, would spread Mali’s fame even further and on to Europe where tall tales of this king’s fabulous wealth in gold began to stir the interest of traders and explorers. Mansa Musa, the Mali Empire’s greatest ever ruler, was said to have spent so much gold in the markets of the Egyptian city that the value of bullion crashed by 20%.
Hope this helps you !!!!!!
