1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BlackZzzverrR [31]
3 years ago
10

How was the Allies' strategy toward Germany after World War I different from their strategy after World War l?

History
2 answers:
BaLLatris [955]3 years ago
8 0

We had to change because the geneva convention cause the form of weaponry was to unhuman

MArishka [77]3 years ago
8 0

During World War I, the Allies decided to apply a "Total War" strategy, which consisted of destroying the enemy's resources. This would usually result in lengthy battles that lasted numerous weeks or even months. 

On the other hand, World War II consisted of the Leap Frogging Strategy, which consisted of isolating key enemy dependencies and subsequently attacking them once they were lacking the capability to cover for their primary needs. 

You might be interested in
Which amendment would strict constructionists look to in order to justify a limited of constitution?
MrRa [10]
The answer is B.10th Amendment 
3 0
4 years ago
Proclamation of tolerence of christianity issued by constantine
Vadim26 [7]
<span>It is Edict of Milan</span>
4 0
3 years ago
What are some assets that Richard Nixon possessed as a presidential candidate
aleksklad [387]

Answer:

Richard Nixon, 37th president of the United States (1969–74), who, faced with ... financial assets and liabilities in embarrassing detail, noting that his wife, Pat, unlike ... The Eisenhower-Nixon ticket defeated the Democratic candidates

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which three U.S. presidents are MOST closely associated with advancements in the Civil Rights Movement in post-World War II Amer
Feliz [49]
Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon Johnson
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During British rule, most ordinary Indian citizens suffered because of poor sanitation. famines. crumbling infrastructure. inade
Trava [24]

Answer: is a

Explanation:

One negative consequence of the British raj´s rule is that civil servants were segregated from ordinary Indians. The British Raj was the rule by the British Crown on the Indian subcontinent from 1858 to 1947. The rule is also known as Crown rule in India, or direct rule in India.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What problems did Bosina have in the 1990s
    12·1 answer
  • In colonial times, what was the fastest way to get from New York to Philadelphia
    9·1 answer
  • The two great Humanists that contributed to Renaissance politics were Machiavelli and _____.
    6·2 answers
  • Which best shows how Egypt became an empire?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the creation of the u.s. northern command by the department of defense such?
    7·1 answer
  • What key idea is missing from the Preamble to the Constitution?
    6·2 answers
  • What was one impact of westward expansion in the United States during mid-nineteen century
    5·2 answers
  • How did kinship ties and gender roles shape economic activities in sub-Saharan Africa prior to 1000?
    14·1 answer
  • 10. Who does the Fourteenth Amendment grant citizenship to?
    11·1 answer
  • Which Russian social group became radicalized in the 1860s and 1870s after the failure of educational and agricultural reforms?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!