1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pshichka [43]
3 years ago
8

What are Kant's objections to taking the consequences of actions as being of "moral worth"? Can you find textual support in Kant

's reading at the end of the chapter?
Social Studies
1 answer:
soldier1979 [14.2K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Kants believe that there actions that are good consequently to a lot of people.They may benefit a lot of people particularly in the society -- It does not make sense if the actions are not morally upright. Lucky, perhaps. But we can not say an action is lucky because they are gooo morally or they are unlucky because they are morally wrong

And utilitarians believe the proper way to evaluate an action is in the consequences. If more people derive more benefits than the other options, then it is morally good and that's all there is to be said.

For Kant, that is not all there is to be said.

evaluation of  the moral worth of action by Utilitarian moral theories  on the basis of happiness that is produced by an action.

Kant has an objection to moral evaluations of this sort. The reason behind is objection is that utilitarian theories  devalue the individuals it is supposed to benefit.

Kent alos objects because the utilitarian theories is bent on man inclination for happiness and pleasure not by universal moral laws.

Explanation:

Kants believe that there actions that are good consequently to a lot of people.They may benefit a lot of people particularly in the society -- It does not make sense if the actions are not morally upright. Lucky, perhaps. But we can not say an action is lucky because they are gooo morally or they are unlucky because they are morally wrong

And utilitarians believe the proper way to evaluate an action is in the consequences. If more people derive more benefits than the other options, then it is morally good and that's all there is to be said.

For Kant, that is not all there is to be said.

evaluation of  the moral worth of action by Utilitarian moral theories  on the basis of happiness that is produced by an action.

Kant has an objection to moral evaluations of this sort. The reason behind is objection is that utilitarian theories  devalue the individuals it is supposed to benefit.

Kent alos objects because the utilitarian theories is bent on man inclination for happiness and pleasure not by universal moral laws.

You might be interested in
Which of these is a limitation of freedom of speech?
Neporo4naja [7]

a) a person cannot commit slander or libel.

4 0
3 years ago
A college administrator is trying to assess whether an admissions test accurately predicts how well applicants will perform at h
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:C)valid

Explanation:

A valid argument is an argument whose conclusions can be traced or related to the premise of such an argument.

Any argument whose conclusions can be linked up with the initial assumptions made by the premise if invalid.

The action of the college administrator of trying to assess whether an admissions test accurately predicts how well applicants will perform at his school the College administrator is concerned whether there is a valid Relationship.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the context of motivation theories, ___________ is defined as the process of changing behavior by changing the consequences t
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

Reinforcement.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
When Pierre doesn't understand his supervisor's instructions, he blames his boss for not making the instructions clear. Pierre's
vodomira [7]

Answer:

B.  False Assumption

Explanation:

False Assumption: this is a term that describes the type of barriers to effective listening. This type of barrier occurs, when the information or message receiver assumed that the communication is the sole responsibility of the sender or the speaker, while receiver has no role to play.

In other words, it is the assumption that the receiver does not required to be active in listening, giving feedback or ask questions relating to point of discuss.

Other types of Listening barriers includes but not limited to the following:

1.  Physiological barriers: this relates to mind, or absence of mind to the information being passed.

2.  Physical barriers: e.g environment noise

3.  Attitudinal barrier: such as work related or egocentrism

4.  Lack of training

5.  Gender barriers

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did Texas have slaves in the 1800's?
Firdavs [7]
Yes Texas has slaves from 1821-1860
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • William Lloyd Garrison
    13·1 answer
  • The alternative to voting a straight-ticket is to vote a _____?
    13·1 answer
  • What conditions are necessary for coral reefs to form? Where are these conditions found?
    5·2 answers
  • What event triggered the start of World War I?
    6·1 answer
  • The outer or penukbral shadow is an area where earth block. of the
    12·1 answer
  • Sam, the serial killer, spent most of his life bouncing between foster homes; he hung out with Satanists; had a history of ADHD
    13·1 answer
  • A(n) __________ is a detailed study of the life and activities of a group of people in which researchers may live with that grou
    15·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    11·1 answer
  • Why young people find the transition between school and university challenging
    11·1 answer
  • How old was julia child when she started the french chef.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!