Answer:
Read below
Explanation:
1: Barbarians kept on attacking
2: Internal stability like the killing of Julis Ceaser
3: Ethnic groups inside the Roman Empire that wanted to be free
4: People were hungry for power
5: Failing economic system
6: The Roman Empire being split in two
7: Some people didn't want to change there religion
8: Rise Of Islam ( later years )
9: Different cultures
Answer:
an American independence movement
<em>the next answer is</em>
an increase in social activism
Explanation: edg 2020
The best option from the list would be that "<span>c He did not believe presidents ought to have a third term," since it shows him refusing to take back his "throne" that is being given to him by the American people. </span>
12) C 14) b. 15) A hope it helps
I can't really answer your question (as I don't really know enough about 18th century France), but I just want to clear up an (understandable) misconception about Feudalism in your question.
The French revolution was adamant and explicit in its abolition of 'feudalism'. However, the 'feudalism' it was talking about had nothing at all to do with medieval 'feudalism' (which, of course, never existed). What the revolutionaries had in mind, in my own understanding of it, was the legally privileged position of the aristocracy/2nd estate. This type of 'feudalism' was a creation of early modern lawyers and, as a result, is better seen as a product of the early-modern monarchical nation-state, than as a precursor to it. It has nothing to do with the pre-nation-state medieval period, or with the Crusades.
Eighteenth-century buffs, feel free to chip in if I've misrepresented anything, as this is mostly coming from my readings about the historiographical development of feudalism, not any revolutionary France expertise, so I may well have misinterpreted things.
