<h2>Evaluating Composite Functions</h2><h3>
Answer:</h3>
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
We can write how 
will be defined but that's too much work and it's only useful when we are evaluating with many inputs.
First let's solve for 
first. As you read through this answer, you'll get the idea of what I'm doing.
Given:
Solving for :
Now we can solve for 
, since 
, 
.
Given:
Solving for 
:
Now we are can solve for 
. By now you should get the idea why 
.
Given:
Solving for :
It's linear
If you evaluate x when it's 0 you'll get the cut in y, that means the function will pass on (0,7)
The formula for linear functions is y=mx +b
In this case b is 7
M=7-5/0+1
M=2
Now you just write the function down, it would be
F(x) =2x + 7
The answer is true.
Method 1:
The given function is a cubic function. And inverse of a cubic function is also a function.
Method 2:
Since the function is one-to-one function i.e it passes the horizontal line test, its function will pass the vertical line test which is a test if a relation is a function or not.
So, yes the inverse of G(x) will be a function.
Won’t it look the same because you are basically rotating it in a full circle
Answer: Left 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Move 2 units back which is left
