Answer:
Wilson and his policy's had changed history, and defined the 20th century, a lot more than john f Kennedy or Reagan. with his new form of imperialism called Wilsonian interventionism, which the us continues, he segregated the federal government and even fostered the second KKK through his historian credentials. he expanded the executive branches powers to large proportions, and soured several diplomatic relations. Wilson had been sympathetic to the confederates. when Wilson was young he had lost cause revisionism when it came to the civil war. as he grew he believed the USA was the shining city on the hill. Wilson was a very religious person, he was very strict on his opinion, even on the smallest things he would fight tooth and nail on his opinion. Wilson didn't have a good grasp on how the world actually worked. during world war one he had tried to smother any flame for the USA to join the great war.
I think the answer is Emperor Justinan
Answer:
In my opinion, Martineau was concerned with the morals of the factory owners because the morals of the factory owners’ effects directly to the benefits of the people who work in the factory.
I hope this helped, this is my opinion and that is what the question was asking for your opinion in the subject.
Answer:
In the nineteenth century, the doctrine of Manifest Destiny was a common belief among the inhabitants of the United States that American colonizers should expand in North America, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. It expressed the belief that the American people were elected by God to civilize their continent.
The Manifest Destiny was not a thesis embraced by all American society. The differences within the country itself about the objective and consequences of the policy of expansion determined its acceptance or resistance.
The northeastern states believed for the most part that the United States should take its concept of "civilization" throughout the continent through territorial expansion. In addition, for US commercial interests, the expansion offered large and lucrative access to foreign markets and thus allowed to compete in better conditions with the British. Having ports in the Pacific would facilitate trade with Asia.
The southern states sought to extend slavery. New slave states would strengthen the power of the south in Washington and would also serve to place the growing slave population.
This north-south conflict became clear with the question of Texas's entry into the Union and was one of the main causes of the future Civil War.
There were also political groups that saw the excessive territorial extension as dangerous; they believed that their political system and the formation of a nation would be difficult to apply in such a vast territory. This position was defended as much by some leaders of the Whigs as by some expansionist Republican-Democrats, who argued about how much territory should be acquired.
Another point of discussion was the use of force. Some political leaders (whose maximum exponent was James K. Polk) did not hesitate to try to annex the largest possible territory even at the risk of triggering wars (as in fact happened) with other nations. Others opposed (albeit timidly) the use of force, on the grounds that the benefits of their system alone would suffice for the territories to join voluntarily.
It can be said that the own supporters of the "Manifest Destiny" formed a heterogeneous group with different interests.
Answer:
Mansa Abubakr II
Explanation:
Mansa Abubakr II crossed the Atlantic Ocean in 1311
but no one knows if he reached
indonesiawindow.com