1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
galina1969 [7]
3 years ago
11

During world war 1 it was a crime to criticize the president or the war effort. Would a court today find such a law as a constit

utional valid interpretation of the dirt amendment? Why or why not
History
1 answer:
Lyrx [107]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A court today would not find that to be constitutionally valid.

Explanation:

There is a multitude of laws that override the censorship of press, especially to criticize the president. When there are restrictions in free speech, citizens may feel as though they are being dis-empowered. The first amendment allows for free speech, and even if the sitting president feels that it may be harmful, they have no authority to stop free speech.

You might be interested in
How does the war power resolution of 1973 attempt to check some of the military power of the president
GaryK [48]

the president should inform Congress of his intention to send troops abroad within 48 hours.

hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
Write 3 sentences about how China's Nationalists and Communists united to go against Japan
Nana76 [90]

The Chinese Nationalist Party and the the Communist Party of China came together to form an alliance during the Second Sino-Japanese War, when Japan tried to invade China.

Explanation:

Before the happening of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937, the Chinese Civil War was already going on, fought between the Chinese Nationalist Party and the Communist Party of China. However, when Japan tried to invade China in 1937, the then Chinese leader Chiang Kai-shek realized that China was ill-prepared for a full fledged war against China, given the chaotic domestic situation. As a result, he decided to unite China against Japan and thus the Nationalists and the Communists came together to form the alliance which was referred to as the "Second United Front".

8 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of the Compromise of 1877?
juin [17]
The answer would be C.


The Compromise of 1877, settled the intensely disputed 1876 presidential election. It resulted in the United States federal government pulling the last troops out of the South, and formally ending the Reconstruction Era.
3 0
3 years ago
Why did the French Huguenots immigrate to America? America provided a better opportunity for a new life. They were being persecu
Anna35 [415]
Think most they want migrate to Usa for a better life
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Misspelled plural noun
lutik1710 [3]
2. Would be Hobbies.

3. Would be Hills.

4. Would be Geese.

5. Would be Churches.

6. Would be Highways.

Hope I helped, and If I did, please give brainliest!
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What position did the king of France appoint Leonardo to when he went to France
    15·1 answer
  • Which statements describe characteristics of complex villages? Choose three answers.
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 contribute to religious discrimination against Native Americans? A) It prohibited the pri
    14·2 answers
  • What regions of the world have the highest levels of population density?
    14·2 answers
  • The forced migration of the Cherokee Indians 1838-39.
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone help me ?
    15·2 answers
  • Bacon’s Rebellion exemplified
    7·1 answer
  • Which branch of government governs U.S. territories?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the outermost surface of most fish covered with?
    9·2 answers
  • It is easyyyyy help please
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!