I support Andrew Jackson's claim which states that the Indian Removal was done in the best interests of American Indians.
The indian removal of the United States to Individual States brough several benefits, such as:
- It put an end to a possible <u>danger of collision.</u>
- It <u>allowed states to grow</u> rapidly in wealth, power and population, which reinforced the southwestern border.
In addition, the indian removal to the native americans contributed to:
- <u>Release the Indians</u> of the power of the state.
- Enabled them to <u>maintain their way of life</u> (culture, traditions, language, etc).
As Jackson quoted himself "The removal was necessary because the <u>Native Americans would be annihilated</u>".
<span>Good Morning!
World War II was a shock to the world. After the sequence of blood shed in the first half of the century, the ideal was now to preserve some peace. The division of the world into two poles, however, ensured the continuation of regional conflicts: Korea, Vietnam, for example. US and USSR financed these conflicts. Peace, however, would have to be guaranteed by the newly created UN, by international alliances and by the financial assistance of the powers to rebuild the destroyed countries.</span>
Answer:
The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for arable land during the rampant growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on Cherokee land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners harbored toward American Indians.
Explanation:
Intellectual property is just as essential to freedom as other forms of property, and just as morally justified. It secures the same type of labor and the same values as property. It thus secures the life and liberty of its owners, and provides uniquely important support to free expression and free inquiry :)
It was developed in Italy but i’d say England bc it became a strong native tradition there
