1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bearhunter [10]
3 years ago
14

Which of the following types of government is formed around religious laws and leaders

History
2 answers:
raketka [301]3 years ago
8 0

The form of governance ruled and formed by the religious leaders and governed by religious laws are termed as the theocracy.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The theocracy is the form of governance where there is strong hold of religious belief and is being governed by the religious leader.

Theocratic governance has the theme of governance as the God is the head of the government guiding the leaders through. It is often called the rule of God. For example, kingdom of Jeddah and Israel had in its early times.

ki77a [65]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

the answer is theocracy

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Indigenous tribes of North America exhibited cultural __________________ based on ________________ and ___________________ diffe
34kurt

Answer:

this question is incomplete

Explanation:

is there any options to this questions.

3 0
3 years ago
In one paragraph, compare life in the Roman Republic with life in the Roman Empire. Include specific examples that explain how l
dlinn [17]

How did Rome go from being one of many city-states in the Italian peninsula to being the center of the most powerful empire in the ancient world? Part of the answer lies in the political institutions that Rome developed early in its history. As Rome expanded its influence over more and more areas, its political institutions proved both resilient and adaptable, allowing it to incorporate diverse populations.

According to Roman tradition, the Republic began in 509 BCE when a group of noblemen overthrew the last king of Rome. The Romans replaced the king with two consuls—rulers who had many of the same powers as the king but were elected to serve one-year terms. Each consul could veto, or reject, the actions of the other consul. Although the office of consul probably did not exist in its final form until around 300 BCE, the idea behind this change—to prevent any one man from becoming too powerful—was present early on in Roman thought and shaped many of Rome’s political institutions.

Roman political institutions reflected Roman society, which was divided into two classes: the patricians, wealthy elites, and the plebeians, the common people. Initially, only the patricians were able to hold political office and make important decisions. For example, plebeians could not join the Roman Senate—an advisory body unable to create laws on its own but whose recommendations were taken seriously by the consuls. To become a senator, a Roman had to have held a political office, and plebeians could not. Over time, however, the plebeians were able to gain more influence in the political system.

Between the years 494 and 287 BCE, new political offices for plebeians were created and access to higher office, including the consulship, was opened to them. Voting assemblies and councils were established that gave plebeians more say in the politics of Rome. In 287 BCE, a law removed the last barrier to plebeian political participation by abolishing the requirement that proposed laws had to be approved by patrician senators before the Plebeian Council could consider them.

The Plebeian Council had real power and influence in Roman politics and some plebeians gained power and wealth under these new arrangements, but many remained poor. One reason that political rights did not lead to major changes was that the Comitia Centuriata—the main voting assembly that elected consuls and other important officials—was organized based on wealth. Each century—or voting group—had one vote, but the wealthy were split into smaller groups than the poor, giving the vote of a wealthy Roman more influence.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Outsiders Johnny says, "I couldn't shoot anybody." However, he just stabbed someone. How is this different?
Alex

The only difference between the two is the action in which it was done. They are still similar because you are physically hurting another individual.

5 0
3 years ago
What colonial group was born out of the protests, in New England, over the Stamp
stiv31 [10]

Answer:

the sons of liberty

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What is an autocracy goverment
earnstyle [38]
An autoracy government is a form of government in which one person has unlimited power.
 
Hope this helps! ;)
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how the Great Depression weakened the western democracies
    5·1 answer
  • Does Lincoln believe that how you make a living is a fixed or permanent condition
    5·2 answers
  • Why were white tailed deer almost driven to extinction? What strategies were used to recover their population?
    11·1 answer
  • "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain un
    14·2 answers
  • Do you think Gupta enforcement of caste rules was a good idea? Why or why not?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the reason for the founding of the Georgia colony?
    11·1 answer
  • GIVING POINTS!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Evaluate the relative importance of different causes for the expanding role of the United States in the world in the period from
    11·2 answers
  • What is federalism?
    15·1 answer
  • EASY SUPER POINTS TO GET IT!!
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!