This question is incomplete because the claim is missing; here is the complete question:
Consider this claim from an editorial. Candidate Wilkins is the best choice for state representative because of her ability to inspire young people to vote. Which example of evidence would best support this claim?
A. A live television report from a youth fundraiser for Wilkins’s campaign
B. An anecdote from a family member about why Wilkins is the best person to vote for
C. An excerpt from a novel about a character named Wilkins who fights for democracy
D. A printed transcript of a campaign speech given by Wilkins at a local high school
E. A graph showing an increase in social media posts from young people about Wilkins during the campaign
F. A story a neighbor overheard about Wilkins while commuting to work last week
The correct answers to this question are A. A live television report...; D. A printed transcript...; and E. A graph showing...
Explanation:
To effectively support a claim it is necessary to include evidence that directly proves the claim is valid. Additionally, evidence should be objective, which means anecdotes, personal opinions, and similar must be avoided.
According to this, to show Candidate Wilkins is the best because she inspires young people to vote it is necessary to prove how young people have been inspired. This is possible through a television report from a youth fundraiser in the campaign (option A) because this shows the positive influence of the candidate in young people. Also, a transcript of the speech of Wilkins at a school (option D) is an effective evidence because this shows the compromise of Wilkins to inspire young people and connect with them. Finally, a graph about media posts from young people (option E) is also a piece of adequate evidence because as the previous ones this is objective and shows the influence of Wilkins in the young population.
