1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatiyna
3 years ago
15

In which form of gov do delegates speak on behalf of citizens

History
2 answers:
Tju [1.3M]3 years ago
5 0

The form of government where delegates speak on behalf of citizens is the Representative Democracy.

Representative Democracy consists of electing officials to represent a group of people, and having these delegates govern under the restrictions posed by a Constitution and other branches of power like an independent judiciary and a legislature (often bicameral).

hammer [34]3 years ago
3 0

In REPRESENTATIVE type of government,do delegates speak on behalf of citizens.

You might be interested in
What happened after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand that led to ​ World War I ​ ?
Bogdan [553]

Answer: The murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand outraged Austria-Hungary. ... Austria-Hungary was furious and, with Germany's support, declared war on Serbia on July 28. Within days, Germany declared war on Russia—Serbia's ally—and invaded France via Belgium, which then caused Britain to declare war on Germany.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
X
algol13

During the 1780s, most state governments found it difficult to revise their constitutions.

<h3>What is Constitution?</h3>

It should be noted that Constitution simply means the principles of laws that guarantee the rights of the people.

In this case, during the 1780s, most state governments found it difficult to revise their constitutions.

Learn more about Constitution on:

brainly.com/question/453546

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Who were the merchants of death
Crank
Merchants of death is a common moniker for arm dealer..
8 0
3 years ago
Whom can tell me the four horseman?
gogolik [260]

Conquest, war, famine, and death



It is said in the bible in the last book called Revelations

4 0
3 years ago
Based on what you have learned in this lesson, write two to three sentences describing one success and one failure of Clinton’s
cupoosta [38]

When the Genocide Convention was passed by the United Nations in 1948, the world said, “Never again.”

But the history of the twentieth century instead proved that “never again” became “again and again.”  The promise the United Nations made was broken, as again and again, genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined.

Why?  Why are there still genocides?  Why are there genocidal massacres going on right now in southern Sudan by the Sudanese government against Dinka, Nuer, and Nuba; in eastern Burma by the Burmese government against the Karen; in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by both government and rebel forces against Tutsis, Banyamulenge, Hutus, Hema, and Lendu?  Why has ethnic and religious hatred again reached the boiling point in Israel and Palestine; Côte d’Ivoire, and Burundi?                                                     

There are two reasons why genocide is still committed in the world:

1.        The world has not developed the international institutions needed to predict and prevent it.

2.        The world’s leaders do not have the political will to stop it.

In order to prevent genocide, we must first understand it.  We must study and compare genocides and develop a working theory about the genocidal process.  There are many Centers for the Study of Genocide that are doing that vital work – in Australia, Brussels, Copenhagen, Jerusalem, Montreal, Memphis, Minneapolis, New Haven, Nottingham, and elsewhere.

But studying genocide is not enough.  Our next task should be to create the international institutions and political will to prevent it.  Four institutions are needed: centers for early warning, programs for conflict transformation, standing forces for rapid intervention, and international courts for effective punishment.

1.  The U.N. Security Council and key governments need strong, independent Early Warning systems to predict where and when ethnic conflict and genocide are going to occur, and to present policy options on prevention and intervention.  The Brahimi report made by the special commission on U.N. Peace-keeping makes just such a recommendation, and it should be implemented.  Selected country desk officers and top officials of the U.N. system now hold monthly “Framework for Coordination” to discuss current crises, but inadequate staffing prevents long-range strategic planning.  There is not a single person at the United Nations whose responsible for genocide early warning and prevention.  Who do you call? Ghostbusters.

:P

<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 1. What was the issue in the Supreme Court case of Plessy v. Ferguson? What did the court rule?
    6·1 answer
  • On June 6, 1944, a combined force of U.S., British, Canadian, and Free French soldiers landed in A) France. Eliminate B) Germany
    14·2 answers
  • What would our world possibly look like today if the original 13 colonies hadn’t rebelled?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the percentage of democrats in dallas 2008?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is another word for especial custom or tradition
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following contributed to tensions between Japan and the United
    7·1 answer
  • Americans who opposed the Vietnam War were called
    11·2 answers
  • A stalemate occurred for several years during the war mainly because both sides resorted to trench warfare. true or false
    10·1 answer
  • Independent Clause
    5·1 answer
  • Inverness is the capital of which region in the u.k.?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!