1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Step2247 [10]
3 years ago
6

Arnold is a bank employee. He has told his colleague Adolf about his intention of embezzling some funds from the bank. Instead o

f advising Arnold against committing such a crime, Adolf has been encouraging his friend to go ahead with the embezzlement. Which type of incomplete crime is Adolf committing in this scenario?
A.
conspiracy
B.
solicitation
C.
attempt
D.
larceny
Social Studies
1 answer:
Nina [5.8K]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B. solicitation.

Indeed, solicitation is defined as the act of encouraging, ordering, asking or soliciting another individual or group of individuals to commit an illegal act. If the crime is not committed, the legal violation is actually conspiracy. If the crime is committed the conspiracy offense is added to the substantive criminal act itself.

You might be interested in
What are man made forms of transportation to move things in France
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

Rail, road, air and water are all widely developed forms of transportation to move things in France.

3 0
3 years ago
At some point, it will occur to you that there is this oddity in the argument: most people living in a civil society never actua
Dominik [7]

There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.

If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.

On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.

3 0
3 years ago
What does magma do?
Olenka [21]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Magma can push through holes or cracks in the crust, causing a volcanic eruption

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is not correct? a. Frictional unemployment is inevitable in a dynamic economy. b. Although the unemployme
Deffense [45]

Answer: Unemployment insurance decreases frictional unemployment.

Explanation:

FRICTIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT

This is unemployment caused by people moving from one job to another. It is temporary and is part of the natural rate of unemployment.

Unemployment insurance does not reduce unemployment because to get unemployment insurance you have to be just that, unemployed. An unemployed person getting unemployment insurance is still unemployed.

Perhaps more concerning is that unemployment insurance might actually increase frictional unemployment. With people getting Unemployment Insurance they might take longer finding a job that they 'feel' suits them, in other words they become selective because they have a financial cushion to fall back on.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anita is experiencing major depression. compared to people who are not depressed, anita is more likely to: have a diminished abi
kati45 [8]
<span>The statement that Anita because of the fact that is experiencing major depression, compared to people who are not depressed, Anita is more likely to </span>have a diminished ability to think, concentrate, and make decisions.
The inability to focus<span> in </span>depression is common. Also <span>impairments in memory and thought processing speed, depression and attention problems characterize this illness.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Molly has a dream that she's being chased by a dog. Her therapist tells her that the dogs are a symbol of the fear she has about
    14·1 answer
  • Mr. Sterling wants to improve student achievement by increasing the time that students spend learning. Which type of time would
    5·1 answer
  • Which US president signed NAFTA into law?
    15·2 answers
  • The federal reserve is the _____ of the united states
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement would be consistent with the views of Fidel Castro
    12·1 answer
  • The recall can sometimes result in ______________________________.
    14·1 answer
  • From your experience was is tenbuktu
    12·2 answers
  • Which athlete is known for their accomplishments in basketball
    12·1 answer
  • What did the U.S do to make sure enough recorces are going to the war effort
    13·1 answer
  • The price of a gallon of almond milk increases from $5 to $10, so people start buying more oat milk as an alternative. This caus
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!