1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivan
4 years ago
10

The line-item veto challenges the notion of A) senatorial courtesy B) congressional oversight C) federalism D) executive privile

ge E) separation of powers
History
1 answer:
Alex777 [14]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:  E) separation of powers

Explanation:

The Line-item veto is a provision that allows an Executive authority such as a Governor or the President to cancel out parts of a bill enacted by Congress without having to veto the whole thing. Essentially it is a partial veto power that allows them to veto a bill only in part should they please.

Governors in 45 US States have this right but the President of the United States does not.

It is argued that this provision violates the principle of Separation of Powers amongst the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive.

This is because the Legislature should have exclusive power to construct the inner texts of a bill and the Executive should not be able to alter this content.

You might be interested in
What was significant about the Ottoman's controlling the Dardanelles Strait ?
Usimov [2.4K]
This is that so that is this this x that is that this

8 0
3 years ago
The salem witchcraft trials what forces were in conflict the time of the start of the trials
laiz [17]
The colonies just had arrived at the “new land” and they were very big on RELIGION, if you were caught doing something that wasnt “christian like” you would be considered a witch, many people died for something that they didnt do.
4 0
3 years ago
Identify the former Soviet nation that allowed people to flee to west Germany
EleoNora [17]
It was Hungary I believe.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I will make u a brainlist!!
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

\boxed {\boxed {\sf C. \ The \ Bill \ of \ Rights}}

Explanation

When the new Constitution was developing in the late 1700s, there were 2 groups: the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

Both groups knew the current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, was failing. However, the Federalists crafted an entirely new Constitution, but the Anti-Federalists just wanted amendments and revisions to the Articles.

The Articles resulted in a weak and decentralized government. The Anti-Federalists wanted this and stronger state governments. The representatives from these states refused to ratify unless a <u>Bill of Rights </u>was added. This would protect the people's rights in case a leader became too powerful.

7 0
3 years ago
Jonny has 3 4/5 of milk his dad when to get some. When will his dad be back? (WILL MARK BRAINLY)
Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

never

Explanation:

beasue jonny is bad

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 5.2 . 10^8standard notation
    6·1 answer
  • B. Drawing Conclusions: How did Enlightenment thinkers and writers set the stage for revolutionary movements
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Union forces destroy Native American property?
    12·2 answers
  • How did Hitler’s views compare with American views in the same time period?
    11·1 answer
  • What can happen to an elected official if they are suspected of wrongdoing
    10·1 answer
  • If new regulations were passed to prevent
    13·2 answers
  • The New Deal changed political thinking in the United States by promoting the idea that:
    14·1 answer
  • Summary on why the articles of confederation fail
    15·1 answer
  • The process of sending and receiving messages without using any spoken words defines _____. a. verbal communication b. nonverbal
    8·2 answers
  • True or False - Japanese troops occupy the french colony of Indochina and cuts railway lines that supply arms and fuel to China
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!