1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivan
3 years ago
10

The line-item veto challenges the notion of A) senatorial courtesy B) congressional oversight C) federalism D) executive privile

ge E) separation of powers
History
1 answer:
Alex777 [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:  E) separation of powers

Explanation:

The Line-item veto is a provision that allows an Executive authority such as a Governor or the President to cancel out parts of a bill enacted by Congress without having to veto the whole thing. Essentially it is a partial veto power that allows them to veto a bill only in part should they please.

Governors in 45 US States have this right but the President of the United States does not.

It is argued that this provision violates the principle of Separation of Powers amongst the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive.

This is because the Legislature should have exclusive power to construct the inner texts of a bill and the Executive should not be able to alter this content.

You might be interested in
which of the following are characteristics of LDCs? gender inequities, high birth rate, low birth rate, uneven distribution of w
Nastasia [14]
<span>low birth rate i think</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the 1700s and 1800s, European migration to North America resulted in Native Americans experiencing —
skad [1K]

Answer:

- An enormous amount of land

- Lots of Native Americans deaths

Explanation:

I am actually a native american (Zuni and Laguna) so I know about a lot of the history that happened with native americans.

5 0
3 years ago
What role did merchants from Venice, Italy, play in the decline of the Byzantine Empire? They gained control over many Byzantine
Ira Lisetskai [31]
They gained control over many byzantine trade routes. The first is your answer
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pleeeeeas helpp mehh!!!!!!!!!!ahhhhh
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer: A. Allowed California in as a free state, New Mexico and Utah territories to decide about Slavery. It also allowed slave trade in Washington D.C. and strengthened fugitive slave law.

Explanation: As part of the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington D.C.  

Also Claifornia entered the Union as a free state plus a territorieal government was created in Utah.

4 0
3 years ago
True or False
VladimirAG [237]

Answer: true

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE I NEED! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! THANK YU!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Building support for the ratification of the United States constitution was the purpose of the
    14·1 answer
  • Question- The map above would aid a person in the study of?
    10·2 answers
  • The presidential candidate who receives the largest number of popular votes
    11·2 answers
  • What was the result of Japan’s invasion of other countries?
    5·2 answers
  • How is America influencing other countries
    7·1 answer
  • I will gladly give brainliest to the one who helps me and has it correct, with a proper explanation!
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Franklin D. Roosevelt go to georgia?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the process of commercialization and industrialization affect women workers?
    5·1 answer
  • Legislative powers are detailed in Article I of the Constitution because the thought people would be with a strong executive if
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!