If the question is asking what did the British transform from then historians identify this policy as C, Saulaitry neglect
It's the policy of where the British did not strict rules, regulations, occupation, or tight control over the colonies.
Navigation Acts is the answer I believe since Navigation Acts were the first piece of legislation were the parliament passed to enforce the rules of law onto the colonies.
Answer:
I believe it's the 3/5 compromise which involved counting slaves as part of the population
<span>The Austro-Hungarian empire was endangered by feelings of nationalism because there were multiple national groups within the empire. So fulfilling nationalist goals would mean a dividing of the empire. The mere fact that the question refers to the empire as "Austro-Hungarian" is already a strong hint of the issue. Prior to 1867, it had been known as simply the Austrian Empire, but a compromise in 1867 meant that a dual monarchy was recognized (an Austrian ruler and a Hungarian ruler). The Hungarians were given self-governing authority over their own internal affairs in their portion of the empire. Other people groups within the empire would seek their own recognition as well -- Czechs, Serbs, Croats, etc. So where nationalism was a uniting factor in regions like the Italian peninsula and the German territories north of Austria, for the Austrian empire, nationalism was a dividing force.</span>
Answer:
Plato and Aristotle here agree on two points,They both approved an aristocratic rule. The Plato believed in philosopher king-rule by reason and wisdom while as Aristotle advocated in rule by merit i.e aristocracy.
Explanation:
Plato and Aristotle both developed important ideas about government and politics. Two of the many political subjects that these men wrote about were tyranny and the rule of law. Tyranny occurs when absolute power is granted to a ruler.
