Answer:
d.
Explanation:
D is the only one that makes sense.
Answer:
•The relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.
Explanation:
Without transitions the argument will be unorganized. The reader will need to know how to follow along in a argument.
<3
Woolf states that is difficult that genius is produced by uneducated people, such as women in Shakespeare's time were, and such the worker class is today. If a person doesn't have the chance to study, to practise, to get experience at the chosen craft, it is impossible that becomes a genius. Geniosity is not a gift but something that can be achieved by study and practise.
Women in Shakespeare's time didn't have a chance to become genius, they had to work ward for other people, their families first or their husbands when the time came. A woman "born with a great gift in the sixteenth century would certainly have gone crazed, shot herself, or ended her days in some lonely cottage outside the village, half witch, half wizard, feared and mocked at." To pursue her dream would have been "doing a violence to herself", to make themselves face rejection and mockery on and on and on wold make anybody ill, physically or psychologically. And if they managed to survive and write, "looking at the shelf where there are no plays by women, her work would have gone unsigned".
The difference I see is exhibit(n) are items or objects and exhibition is an event in which the items are shown
No, otherwise it would not be an opinion. you can turn a
hypothesis into factual info by carrying out an experiment.
