Answer: $425,000
Explanation: The total overhead cost can be computed suing following formula :-
total overhead cost = fixed overhead cost + variable overhead cost
where,
fixed overhead cost = $90,000
=$335,000
so,putting the values into equation we get :-
total overhead cost = $90,000 + $335,000
= $425,000
Answer:
WILL YOU PAY ME IF I TELL YOU THE ANSWER
Explanation:
Answer:
A.
Dr Cash 266,178
Cr Sales Revenue 243,741
Cr Unearned Warranty Revenue 22,437
b)Current Liabilities:Unearned Warranty Revenue 90,579
Long-term liabilities:Unearned Warranty Revenue 181,158
Explanation:
Teal Company
A.
Dr Cash (814*327) 266,178
Cr Sales Revenue 243,741
Cr Unearned Warranty Revenue (277*81) 22,437
b)Current Liabilities:Unearned Warranty Revenue 90,579
(327×277)
Long-term liabilities:Unearned Warranty Revenue 181,158
(90,579×2)
Answer: The invisible hand
Explanation: Invisible hand can be defined as those unobservable market forces which helps the forces of demand and supply to reach to an equilibrium level.
In the given case, Daniel is giving work to local suppliers and jobs to residents as well as producing demand in the market by its products, thus, we can conclude that the given case is an example of invisible hand.
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
