Answer: He was not able to afford a more formal education because he wasn’t any richer then a well off commoner.
Explanation: He wasn’t as rich as you needed to be back in the day to receive a formal education. He did go to a commoner school were he learned about fine arts though. I hope this helps!
"His confidence is transformed by the crowd’s response" is the way among the choices given in the question that the <span>author portray Scotty in this excerpt. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A". I hope that the answer has come to your great help.</span>
Answer:
send me the link plsss and i would be glad to help!
Explanation:
The argument is that the original US Constitution did not intend for African slaves to be “citizens” of the United States. It is historically false since as dissenter justices Curtis and McLean stated, five of the original 13 states had a sizable minority of free black men who were citizens that could also vote in federal and state elections. Now that being established, the correct answer should be “hasty generalization” since the argument pretends that all citizens, at the time of the ratification of the constitution were white and that only these "all white" citizens were able to vote which is historically false. It could not be a genetic fallacy since the historical precedent invalidates the claim that the intended meaning of the word “citizens” only applied to white Americans. It could not be an <em>ad populum</em> fallacy since not all Americans agreed with such contention, and finally, it could not be a case of begging the claim since they do provide a finding that in their view supports their erroneous conclusion, so it is not circular logic.
