Answer: No, because all of the defendant's facilities and offices are in State A.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, a federal district court cannot have subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's action.
In this case, there's no subject matter jurisdiction by the court as theres subject matter jurisdiction when there is full diversity of citizenship, and the amount of controversy is more tha $75,000.
Answer:
because it's only April
Explanation:
school doen't end until may
Answer: c. $1,650 unfavorable
Explanation:
The direct labor rate variance shows the difference between the cost of direct labor that the company thought it would incur vs what it actually incurs for the period.
Formula is:
Direct labor rate variance = Actual cost of direct labor - Standard cost of actual hours of direct labor
= Actual hours * (Actual cost - Standard cost)
= 5,500 * (24 - 23.70)
= $1,650 unfavorable
Unfavorable because the actual cost incurred was more than the cost anticipated.
Answer:
$93,750
Explanation:
Required: "<em>Calculate the overhead assigned to the fabric case using the traditional costing system based on direct labor hours."</em>
<em />
Total estimated overhead costs (A) = 150,000
Total labor hours (B) = 15,000 + 9,000 = 24,000
Overhead allocation rate (C) = A/B = 150,000/24,000
Overhead allocation rate (C) = $6.25 Per labor hour
Total labor hours used by Fabric case (D) = 15,000 Hours
Overhead assigned to the fabric case (C*D) = $6.25 Per labor hour * 15,000 Hours = $93,750
