Your voltmeter and your teacher are both right, but the water analogy of electricity can only go so far. One big drawback is that, unlike with water, there is no absolute voltage. .... Wherever you put the black lead is defined as "0V". .... flowing (i.e. the circuit is broken) you will not get this change in voltage.
Written and oral communication skills are an example of skills that cover all areas of specialization that are most valued by employers when hiring a new employee.
Communication is an essential skill in every organization, it is through it that the flow of information to organizational processes and interaction takes place, so this is an essential skill in any employee.
Employers therefore value professionals with written and oral communication skills because they are a company's primary needs, as knowing how to communicate assertively and knowing how to relate to their co-workers will directly impact organizational culture, motivation, work productivity , etc.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/23119187
Answer:
c. um sujeito e um núcleo is correct option in the given problem statement.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the text or the excerpt for reference.
There are also no options attached.
What response? From who? What is the reference?
However, trying to help, we can comment on the following general terms.
What does his response tell you about the Framers' intentions regarding the institutional design of the judiciary?
You are probably referring to Federalists Alexander Hamilton's opinion about the judiciary.
If that is the case, then we can say that Alexander Hamilton wrote the Federalists Paper n.- 78, under a pseudonym, and he referred to the importance of the judiciary. He considered that the judiciary was an important institution to help and protect the people from bad or abusive legislation.
Hamilton also thought that the judiciary was important to enforce the legislation included in the US Constitution. Hamilton thought that the judiciary had the obligation to interpret the legislation to correctly apply it, and also should be the institution to keep an eye on Congress in order to limit it to exceed its powers.
