1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gtnhenbr [62]
3 years ago
7

Which protections are extended by Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment? the right of citizenship the right of states to enforce

any law equal protection under the law due process the right to deprive persons of property
History
2 answers:
Luba_88 [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a. the right of citizenship

c. equal protection under the law

d. due process

Explanation:

got it right on edge 2020

Anna35 [415]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answers are A. The right of citizenship; C. Equal protection under the law; and  D. Due process

Explanation:

The Fourteenth Amendment approved in 1868 recognized the right of citizenship for all people born in the national territory or those that acquire the citizenship. This implies African-Americans and other minorities were officially recognized as citizens. Besides this, the amendment extends other rights and protections through 5 sections.

In the case of the first section, this establishes ratified the right to citizenship, and explicitly states all citizens are equally protected by law. Also, due to this equally protection citizens cannot be arrested or deprived of any right without the due legal process such as the right to have a trial.

You might be interested in
Please explain the programs that a community college offers and the types of education students can receive at a community colle
kkurt [141]

Answer:

-

explore careers

-earn a certificate or associate's degree

-improve gpa

complete ge requirements

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
"In the late 1800s and early 1900s the federal government supported the efforts of the labor movement."
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

The Pullman Strike and Loewe Vs Lawlor

Explanation:

The Pullman Strike was an organised strike by the American Railway Union against the Pullman Company. The strike closed off many of the nations railroad traffic. Workers of the Pullman company had gone on strike in response to a reduction in wages and when this was unsuccessful, they increased their efforts and with the help of the AFU took it nationwide. They refused to couple or move any train that carried a Pullman car. At its peak the strike included  250,000 workers in 27 states.The federal government's response was to obtain an injunction against the union and to order them to stop interfering with trains. When they refused, President Cleveland sent in the army to stop strikers from interfering with the trains. Violence broke out and the strike collapsed. The leaders were sentenced to prison and the ARU dissolved.

Loewe V Lawlor was a Supreme Court decision that went against the rights of the labour movement. D. E. Loewe & Company had been subjected to a strike and a boycott as a result of it becoming an 'open shop'. The nationwide boycott was supported by the American Federation of Labor and persuaded retailers, wholesalers and customers not to buy from Loewe. This boycott cost him a large amount of money and he sued the union for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act (Another piece of legislation subsequently used to attack unions).

The case was sent to the US Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, which found that the lawsuit was out of the scope of the Sherman Act. However, upon appeal it then went to the Supreme Court, who ruled in favour of Loewe. The courts decision was important for two reasons. Firstly it allowed individual unionists to be held personally responsible for damages arising from the activities of their unions. Secondly, it effectively outlawed secondary boycott (Where members of different companies boycott in solidarity with the affected workers) as a violation of the Sherman Act. Both of these limited the ability of the unions to bring about change through striking and boycott.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13463190#readmore

3 0
3 years ago
What inference can be drawn from the lack of US action in response to Japanese aggression against China in 1937
zheka24 [161]
C- do united states did not care about china
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST! Name two nations that controlled Vietnam during the 1940’s.
guapka [62]

Answer:

Japanese...........

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
dlinn [17]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Peninsulares because they were Spanish-American they were at the top of the social class at the time. They ruled the high office, land and commonly wealth.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How dose the annual Jewish festival of Hanukkah connect to Greek rule in judah?
    6·1 answer
  • What tactics did hitler use during the final solution?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an important religious effect of the Black Plague?
    15·1 answer
  • Propaganda is communication that tries to influence how people think, rather then just presenting the facts and letting people m
    6·2 answers
  • Which European country does not include territory that was once part of the Roman Empire?
    13·2 answers
  • In his address at Rice University what does Kennedy argue
    11·2 answers
  • How was Anti-Semitism used against Jews from Germans ?
    6·1 answer
  • How do the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness limit the powers of the government
    13·1 answer
  • Sunni Muslims believe that, after the death of the Prophet Mohammed, the new leader of the Muslim nation should be
    10·1 answer
  • What happened when Soviet forces approached the Auschwitz concentration camp?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!