1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rjkz [21]
3 years ago
8

PLEASE HELP ME THIS IS THE LAST ONE!!!

History
2 answers:
schepotkina [342]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I believe the answer is the Columbian Exchange.

Explanation:

poizon [28]3 years ago
6 0
Middle passage is the answer
You might be interested in
Why is William tucker critical of Carnegie
Neko [114]

Answer: Tucker is critical of Carnegie because a society should not feed off the success of one man.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which constitutional amendment gives the states freedom and control?
sertanlavr [38]
The tenth amendment <span>gives the states freedom and control. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4.05 Unit test : Civic Action and Political discourse
DiKsa [7]

Answer: yea i think my brain just died

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which most accurately describes consequences of the Renaissance in Europe? A- the Renaissance gave rise to the protestant reform
lions [1.4K]

The correct answer is A) The Renaissance gave rise to the protestant reforming and reduced the power of the Catholic Church.

The statement that most accurately describes the consequences of the Renaissance in Europe is "The Renaissance gave rise to the protestant reforming and reduced the power of the Catholic church."

The Protestant Reformation initiated by Martin Luther challenged the political power Catholic Church had in that time. The Pope and the Roman Catholic Church exerted a total dominion and control of people's belief systems and Reformators considered that that dominion had generated corruptive practices inside the Church. Reformation followed ideas of the Renaissance and many branches were formed such as the Anglicans, the Methodists, Calvinists, Baptists, and Lutherans.

5 0
3 years ago
NEED TO BE ANSWERED ASAP!!! WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF IT IS ANSWERED CORRECTLY
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

    The bombing of Hiroshima is and Nagaski is one of the most important events in history. Due to the fact that this affected and still is affecting human kind in Hiroshima and Nagaski. This all occurred because of Hiroshimas military and to the intend to make Japan surrender, in cause to end World War ll, they later decided to bomb Nagaski too. Over 200,000 died and thousands more were hurt in this tragity, but some surviors live to tell the story of this historic moment. Two of those surviors were Sunao Tsuboi and Shigemitsu Tanaka,  victims of the Hiroshima and Nagaski bombing on August 6, 1945 and August 9, of 1945.

   While Sunao Tsuboi was a 20 year old man heading to collage in Hiroshima  when this occurred, he was buned from head to toe he stated in NYTimes.com. He knew at this moment it would be the end for him, he layed next to a bridge. Until a classmate found and  approched him, he took him to a military hsopital where he got medical help. Till this day he is a retired worker, with a wife, children, and grandchildern. He has worked in office for the President and urged and stated this to the president to "work for world peace after he leave office".

  Shigemitsu Tanaka, was almost five when he witness this tragity. He discribed everything as white, windows braking, and a huge thunderclap in the sky. He was only playing under a tree when he took cover and tried to protect  himself. Later his mother suffered from repeated illnesses she worked as an elementary instructor. His father later died from cancer after 12 years of the bombing. Tanka said he "smelled burning flesh and moans", he also stated that Obama should clear nuclear wepons for good and hoped he would sit and listen to survivors.

   I would not defend nor support this tragity due to the fact that many innocent people were hurt or killed. In my opionion I think the United States should have used a diffrerent strategy to the point where no human being should have been hurt. Sometimes I do not understand why the United States didn't take percuation in this situation for the people. They always use the moto "For the good of the people" but did not lead up to this at the end. So in conculsion I DO NOT support or defend the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagaski.  

WRBSITES:https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html

Hope this somewhat helps you out, make sure to check for spelling errors many typos.

websites: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.htmlExplanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which provisions of the Compromise of 1850, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, favored the SOUTH?
    11·2 answers
  • What statement best describes the relationship between the programs of the new deal and the end of the Great Depression
    15·2 answers
  • Which factor made it most difficult for soldiers to cross the area between the trenches
    7·2 answers
  • Hacer un poema con estás palabras solidaridad,vecinos,ayudar,amor honestidad,juntos,fuerza y union
    14·1 answer
  • How did the catholic church respond to the protestant reformation?
    15·2 answers
  • Federation of Americans Indians were Groups of
    8·1 answer
  • Whats latitude guyss
    8·2 answers
  • How did the economic system of manorialism most affect nobles?
    13·1 answer
  • W jakich krajach był faszyzm?
    8·1 answer
  • Question 50 (1 point)
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!