Answer:
Option: D escalation of the Cold War
Explanation:
The Brinkmanship policy of the 1950s resulted in a conflict escalation of the Cold War. The Brinkmanship was a foreign policy between the United States and the Soviet Union. The best example of this policy referred to the Cuban missile crisis when the Soviet place nuclear missiles in Cuba in 1962. The policy forces communication between two parties confrontation to gain an advantageous agreement over the other for power.
Answer:
Those opposed to the development of political parties believed that political parties were a threat to the government and that they could divide our country by discriminating against minorities.
On the other side, there were many who were completely in favor of the development of political parties, based on the notion that people will naturally dispute on matters. Furthermore, they were well aware that people who shared similar viewpoints should band together.
Explanation:
The correct answer is: "by obeying one’s parents - by serving one’s parents -by properly burying one’s parents"
Piety Filial is one of the main ideas of the thought of Confucius, it refers to the respect and love that children should exercise towards their parents, the kindness and the disposition of the sons and daughters towards the elders of the family, this includes not make them fall into shame, is one of the representations of morality.
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
