The boy's rendition of his late father's painting was an absolute monstrosity. It was unveiled right beside the old man's grave to a crowd of dishevelled bystanders, the ladies holding their billowing skirts down and the men scratching at their unkempt beards. It wasn't a particularly sacrilegious artwork, but the crowd would say otherwise. Hands jumped to mouths to keep a scream bottled in, eyes widened to the point of tearing. They'd never seen something quite like it.
An argument is invalid if and only if all the premises is true and the conclusion is false.
We can test the invalidity of the argument by assuming all the premises are true and seeing whether it is possible for the conclusion to be false. If the conclusion is possible to be false, then, the argument is invalid.
A valid argument, on the other hand, is valid if and only if it is necessary that:
1) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true
2) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
3) it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.
Answer for part A:
He uses a metaphor to suggest that white people have proven themselves unworthy of the authority they wield.
Answer for Part B:
It suggests that their deceitful acts are intentional.
I took the test
Answer:
The climax is when Alex and Lena are caught together and Lena gets locked up in her room and the conflict Lena falls in love with a guy and she can't be with him. So she fights for him and runs away with her loved one, Alex. The ending is that once Lena finally escapes from the confines of her oppressive totalitarian government, she sees Alex shot right in front of her. Her only choice is to run into the wilds.
Explanation:
Answer:
that
Explanation:
"that" is better than "which" in this situation
