The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Evaluate the success of the Constitutional principles of separation of powers and checks and balances in addressing concerns about the government under the Articles of Confederation
In reality, it was successful because the Articles of Confederation had many deficiencies. For instance, under the Articles of Confederation, the central government was weak. The states were the ones that were sovereign and independent and has the advantage that they could collect taxes. Congress couldn't. So if the government needed money, it was through the states.
So when the delegates met at the Constitutional Congress of 1787 in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, they debated the best form of government for the United States and decided to have a division of powers under the system of checks and balances in which none of the branches had more power over the others.
Answer:
Look at Explation
Explanation:
We know that in factories the working conditions of the workers are very bad ,they had to work hard ,and they had to work for 10 hours a day . Working 10hour in a day creates spinal disease and many problems to the working worker. That is why the working condition of the working worker in a factory should be improved.Oct 10, 2019
I think it is b
i hope this helps
The issue with democratic systems versus a republic or a constitutional monarchy, whereas there is a Magna Carta, or otherwise any guaranteed protection of the people's rights is that it can be voted away to a majority.
An unelected king that has total control over his subjects with no restraint of power or protection for the people will make none the difference but that in a democracy that person was elected to have total control over his subjects.
The disadvantage, or advantage, of a democracy, is that the majority will always rule over the minority. Regardless of there protected rights.
Many workers used strikes as a means to receive better working conditions. A strike is when a group of employees refuse to do work for a specific business/company. In this case, the employees refuse to go back to work until their demands are met. The goal is to hurt the company, as they will lose money due to the fact that they cannot open for business or generate any new products.
During the late 1800's and early 1900's workers used this strategy to fight for better working conditions such as: shorter work days, better pay, safer working conditions, etc.