The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice or letter B. "a logical fallacy."
In philosophy, a formal fallacy<span> (also called deductive </span>fallacy<span>) is a pattern of reasoning rendered invalid by a flaw in its </span>logical<span> structure that can neatly be expressed in a standard </span>logic<span> system, for example, propositional </span>logic<span>. An argument that is formally </span>fallacious<span> is always considered wrong.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
they were chosen by the legislature
they served a one year term
they could have decisions overruled by legislature
they had little power
Explanation:
Answer:
conditioned response.
Explanation:
Ivan Pavlov gave the Classical conditioning theory in which an unconditioned stimulus which is food, in this case, results in unconditioned response (saliva). It is a biological process, therefore, requires no learning or conditioning. But by experimenting on a dog he explained that the learning process can be instilled by replacing them with condition stimulus (buzzer) and conditioned response (saliva). Therefore the neutral or unconditioned stimulus when replaced with conditioned stimulus which results in learned or conditioned response.