I think it's B because a they have to review the original record since it is their job to decide whether the lower court decision was constitutional. And to do their job they also have to consider the arguements for each side. On a appeal no new facts are presented (fun fact). Frankly it's just my opinion, but B seems the most logical.
So no, the critics weren't anti-American, they simply believed that the US shouldn't have been in WWI, a war all the way across the Atlantic Ocean, were men were led to battle so most good get slaughtered and the few that made it across the battlefield would be gassed.
Answer:
The President can veto a bill indirectly by withholding approval of the bill until Congress has adjourned sine die. This informal way of preventing a bill from becoming a law is called a pocket veto. When the President issues a veto, the bill returns to its House of origin.
Explanation:
Well to be a senate you must be at least 30 years old, be a citizen for 9 years to show loyalty to the U.S. than your own country so maybe (C) or (D)
The north by England, Mexico and central part by the Spanish and Brazi by Portugal
