1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
guapka [62]
3 years ago
7

3. Explain why there is no one accepted convention for periodization.

History
1 answer:
dolphi86 [110]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

3. Because many historical periods are difficult to categorize due to the lack of concrete documentation about them.

4. the analysis and categorization of historical periods is done through the study of documents and relics that provide data on certain historical periods, so that the evidence and events and historical situations can be categorized in each period.

5. The themes change between each society, but they are all focused on common elements of the whole civilization as elements focused on religious themes, commerce, and social structuring.

Explanation:

Periodization is a process carried out by historians and professionals linked to this science. This study allows the past to be divided into blocks that are categorized, named and quantified. The purpose of this is to facilitate historical studies and make the past more defined and clear.

Many historical periods lack documentation that can reveal accurate information about the survey, which makes the end and beginning of each period extremely difficult to determine. This generates a certain inaccuracy that prevents a convention for periodization.

However, these periods are often determined by factors of society formed by themes around the religion of civilizations, as well as trade and socio-governmental relations.

You might be interested in
how would you define the term "massacre"? How many people have to die in order for an event to be called a "massacre".
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Explanation:

Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.

“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.

OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.

Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.

Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….

6 0
3 years ago
Wilhelm I was declared kaiser of Germany in
sergejj [24]
It depends on how specific you want to be, but he was declared kaiser in 1871; more specifically, January 18th, 1871.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who directed the first voyage to circumnavigate the globe?
ollegr [7]
Ferdinand Magellan,
but he died halfway through.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the goal of the new life movement
sveta [45]

The New Life Movement (Chinese: 新生活運動; pinyin: Xīn Shēnghuó yùndòng) was a government-led civic movement in 1930s China to promote cultural reform and Neo-Confucian social morality and to ultimately unite China under a centralised ideology following the emergence of ideological challenges to the status quo.
4 0
3 years ago
The Court of Appeals ______________________ a. makes and maintains laws. b. overturns a governor's veto. c. reviews judgments ma
mote1985 [20]
The Court of Appeals reviews judgements made in lower courts, so the answer is C.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • He cabinet includes one member who is not the head of a department. what is that person's title? who is that person right now?al
    9·1 answer
  • In what way does the thirteenth amendment expand on the emancipation proclamation?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of these laws are created in order to directly protect consumers?
    11·1 answer
  • Find the quotient. Round to the nearest hundredth, 6,789 33*<br> This is a required question
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes a difference between the english and the french in regards to exploration and colonization?
    10·1 answer
  • Which choice tells the main causes of convection currents in the asthenosphere?
    15·1 answer
  • The ideas, things, or events people feel are important are called
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the forty-niners rush to California?
    14·1 answer
  • According to the text, what did many workers do after
    6·1 answer
  • How would have things changed if alexander the great had lived to old age
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!